Basic baton format:
# Context
- Theme: __
- Expected time to fill out: __ min
- Supporting materials:
- __
- ...
# Answer
(Specify a format if you have one)
# Pass flow
(Describe how the baton will be passed)
(Example 1: List all participants in order)
(Example 2: Describe an algorithm for selecting the next person)
A list for deciding how to implement relay-style communication:
- 1: Do you have the capability and bandwidth to build something in-house?
- If yes, you can build it yourself
- 2: Is everyone proficient with GitHub Issues or other ticketing tools?
- If yes, you can operate with 1 baton = 1 ticket
- To pass the baton to the next person, @mention them
- 3: Is everyone proficient with Slack or Teams?
- If yes, you can operate with 1 baton = 1 thread
- To pass the baton to the next person, @mention them
A checklist to assess tool “proficiency” required for relay-style communication:
- 1: Can perform basic operations such as posting, commenting, and reacting
- 2: Understands units such as repositories, threads, and channels
- 3: Can use mentions and understands how they behave
- 4: Can manage notifications on their own, e.g., effectively use mute or watch
If even one item is "No", that person is not proficient.
Training is required before relying on relay-style communication.
A trigger list you can use when naming a tool or mechanism for relay-style communication:
- Relay
- Relaying
- Baton
- -ware
- Relayware
- Batonware